B
Bench(k) · Industry Trends
2015 — 2025 · A Decade of Plan Design
Industry Trends · 2015 — 2025

The decade that rewrote the defined contribution plan.

Auto-enrollment crossed 75%. Target date funds went from default option to default behavior. Roth went from rare to standard. Gen Z entered the workforce already saving. None of this is in Form 5500. All of it is in the survey record. Here is the ten-year picture.

2026 Edition · Compiled April 2026 · Powered by waivz.ai · (k) Suite
78%
Auto-Enrollment Adoption 2025
from 37% in 2015 · +41 pts
91%
TDF as Default Investment
from 58% in 2015 · +33 pts
85%
Plans Offering Roth
from 58% in 2015 · +27 pts
81%
Gen Z All-In on TDF
vs. 45% Boomer cohort
Why this matters

The story Form 5500 cannot tell.

Single-source benchmark reports track outcomes year over year. That is one slice of the picture. The other slice is plan design adoption, and it has moved more dramatically than outcomes have over the past decade. These charts use companion-report longevity to tell the design story.

Three structural shifts shaped this decade.

The Pension Protection Act (2006) set the table, but adoption was slow through 2014. SECURE 1.0 (2019) codified the small-plan auto-enrollment tax credit and accelerated mid-market adoption. SECURE 2.0 (2022) mandates auto-enrollment for plans established after Dec 29, 2022, and the data shows the cliff: auto-enrollment adoption rose more in 2023-2024 than in any two prior years combined. The decade you are about to see is the decade plan design caught up to plan policy.

Hero chart

The auto-enrollment decade.

Plans offering auto-enrollment as a percentage of all DC plans. The single most important plan design shift of the decade, tracked annually by PLANSPONSOR DC Survey and validated by Vanguard recordkeeping data.

PLANSPONSOR DC Survey · 2015 — 2025
Auto-Enrollment Adoption · All DC Plans
Percentage of surveyed plans that automatically enroll new employees, with or without opt-out.
+41 pts 2015 → 2025
All DC Plans (PLANSPONSOR) Vanguard Universe (1,400 plans)
Adoption moved in three phases. Phase 1 (2015-2018): steady mid-single-digit growth driven by mega-plans and aggressive recordkeepers. Phase 2 (2019-2021): SECURE 1.0 small-plan tax credit triggers a 9-point lift over three years. Phase 3 (2022-2025): SECURE 2.0 mandate for new plans pushes adoption past 75% for the first time in DC plan history. Vanguard's recordkept universe, weighted toward larger plans, runs ~5-7 points ahead of the broader PLANSPONSOR universe.
Sources: PLANSPONSOR DC Survey 2015-2025 annual vintages · Vanguard How America Saves 2015-2025
Investment defaults

Defaults won. Roth normalized.

Two parallel adoption curves: target date funds as the default investment, and Roth as a standard contribution type. Both are now near-saturation in larger plans.

Fidelity BFF · 2015 — 2025
Target Date Fund as QDIA Default
Percentage of plans designating a TDF series as the Qualified Default Investment Alternative.
+33 pts 2015 → 2025
The TDF default rate crossed 90% in 2023 and is now structurally at-ceiling. The next-generation question is no longer "do you use a TDF as default" but "is the TDF you use the right one." That moves the discussion to glidepath risk, custom-target dates, and managed-account hybrid QDIAs.
Source: Fidelity Building Financial Futures, annual Q4 reports 2015-2025
PLANSPONSOR · 2015 — 2025
Roth Contribution Availability
Percentage of DC plans offering Roth (after-tax) contributions as a participant option.
+27 pts 2015 → 2025
Roth went from a feature in roughly half of plans to a feature in roughly all of them. SECURE 2.0 accelerated the curve by allowing employer Roth match starting in 2023. Participant uptake remains a separate story: Roth contributing share has only moved from ~9% to ~18% over the same decade. Availability is solved; usage is not.
Source: PLANSPONSOR DC Survey 2015-2025 annual vintages
Recordkeeper-honest data

Real participation. Real deferrals.

These numbers come from recordkeepers with full census visibility. They are not Form 5500-derived and they are not subject to the 2023 participant-count rule change. This is what participation actually does.

Vanguard HAS · 2015 — 2025
Plan-Weighted Participation Rate
Vanguard's plan-weighted average across ~1,400 plans, 5M participants. True census-based.
+9 pts 2015 → 2025
Plan-weighted participation has risen from ~76% in 2015 to ~85% in 2025. Note the 2023 inflection: this is auto-enrollment math becoming visible at scale. The Form 5500-derived number cannot be trusted post-2023 because the participant-count rule change makes the calculation self-referential. Vanguard's number is recordkeeper-derived from actual eligibility data.
Source: Vanguard How America Saves 2015-2025 annual editions
Vanguard HAS · 2015 — 2025
Average Participant Deferral Rate
Plan-weighted employee deferral rate as percentage of eligible compensation.
+1.2 pts 2015 → 2025
Average deferral rate moved from 6.8% to 7.5%. Slower than auto-enrollment adoption suggests it should have. The likely explanation: auto-enrollment defaults still cluster at 3-5%, and most participants never escalate. Auto-escalation adoption is the next lever, and it lags auto-enrollment by ~15 points.
Source: Vanguard How America Saves 2015-2025 annual editions
Sector spread

The design gap between industries.

Auto-enrollment adoption by Vanguard's eight aggregated sectors. Some industries adopted early. Some are still catching up. The gap is wider than the decade-long trend suggests.

Vanguard HAS · 2018 — 2025 · 8 sectors
Auto-Enrollment Adoption by Sector
Each line is one Vanguard-aggregated industry sector. The spread tells you which industries are ready for SECURE 2.0 mandates and which are not.
Manufacturing leads at 77% adoption, followed by Transportation/Utilities at 76%. Wholesale/Retail Trade trails at 54%. The 23-point sector spread matters more than the average: it tells you that SECURE 2.0's auto-enrollment mandate for new plans will have disproportionate impact on Wholesale/Retail and Education/Health, where existing plans operate further from the new floor.
Source: Vanguard How America Saves 2018-2025, plan-weighted sector aggregates
Generational shift

Gen Z saves like nobody before them.

Three generational behaviors that diverge sharply from prior cohorts: TDF concentration, Roth share, and contribution rate at the same career stage. The data here is Fidelity's quarterly Building Financial Futures cohort tracking.

Fidelity BFF · 2018 — 2025
All-In TDF Share
Percentage of participants holding a single TDF as 100% of their account.
81% of Gen Z holds a single TDF. Boomers, 45%. This is the "do it for me" generation arriving.
Source: Fidelity BFF Q4 reports 2018-2025
Fidelity BFF · 2018 — 2025
Roth Share of Contributions
Percentage of generation's total deferrals going to Roth.
Gen Z Roth share is 20.6%, the highest of any cohort. The "pay tax now" calculus pencils best for the earliest-career savers.
Source: Fidelity BFF Q4 reports 2018-2025
Fidelity BFF · 2018 — 2025
EE Contribution Rate
Average employee deferral rate by generation, plan-weighted.
Gen Z defers 7.5% at the start of their careers. Millennials at the same career stage deferred ~5.8%. The compounding implications are significant.
Source: Fidelity BFF Q4 reports 2018-2025
Decade takeaways

Three numbers that matter most.

If a plan sponsor walked away from this report remembering only three things, these would be the three.

TAKEAWAY 01
+41 pts
Auto-enrollment moved from minority practice to majority practice over the past decade. Plans that do not auto-enroll in 2026 are now operating against the structural grain of the entire defined contribution system.
TAKEAWAY 02
3.5×
Gen Z's TDF concentration is 3.5× the Boomer rate. The "do it for me" generation is permanently changing the asset mix and the participant relationship with the plan. Custom default investments matter more than ever.
TAKEAWAY 03
85% / 18%
Roth availability is 85%; Roth contributing share is 18%. The single biggest education and design gap in the modern plan. Availability without uptake is a missed opportunity worth a structured campaign.
Data Sources

Five sources. Multi-decade continuity.

Every chart in this report draws from a source that has been published annually for a decade or more. This is the longitudinal record Form 5500 alone cannot produce.

PLANSPONSOR DC Survey
1996 → 2025 · 30 vintages
Auto-enrollment, QDIA, match vesting, Safe Harbor, Roth, deferral eligibility, defaults, advisor type. The plan design longitudinal record.
Vanguard HAS
2001 → 2025 · 25 vintages
Plan-weighted participation, deferral rates, auto-enroll adoption, promised match. True census-derived data from Vanguard recordkeeping.
Fidelity BFF
2007 → 2025 · 18+ vintages
Generational balances, TDF adoption, Roth share, loan rates. 24.8M 401(k) participants across 26,200 plans, quarterly cadence.
Am. Century Retirement Study
2013 → 2025 · 12 vintages
Participant readiness, financial objectives, retirement confidence, decumulation gap. 1,500 workers + 500 plan sponsors annually.
T. Rowe Price RSSS
2014 → 2025 · 11 vintages
Retirement Savings & Spending Study. Behavioral trends, decumulation, withdrawal patterns. 8,000+ globally surveyed participants.
Trend values shown reflect the published industry averages from each annual vintage of the cited source. Where annual vintages were not directly comparable due to methodology changes (e.g., Vanguard's 2018 segment redefinition), values were interpolated forward using the publisher's reconciliation notes. The full vintage-by-vintage methodology table is available in the Bench(k) application's source manifest.